While House Democrats united to protest the lack of effort to bring about gun rights reform, the rest of Washington has decided to stick with the terrorist angle of the mass-shooting at a gay nightclub in Orlando. Not surprising that Republican Presidential nominee Donald Trump has resorted to blaming the entire violent act on ISIL and Islam, but for his Democratic opponent Secretary Hillary Clinton to take the bait is a bit astounding.
Sure it's basic politics to respond to your opponent during
a presidential election campaign, but it is time for the Clinton camp to learn
that not everything Trump says needs to be refuted publicly. Leave that for
Jake Tapper and the Washington Post. If Clinton wants to appeal to more voters,
keeping the focus on gun control laws is the better route to take. Most on the
left rightfully blame this attack as a gun
control
problem,
not a terrorist threat.
Clinton
has given necessary attention to the issue of lax gun regulations and needing
to reinstate a ban on assault rifles, but still her campaign
statement primarily focused on the terrorist element of the attack. She has
since become embroiled in the issue
of how culpable ISIL is for this lone-wolf attack, and what type of punishment
should be given.
She has even declared support
for increase in Patriot Act style surveillance to monitor online activity of
potential radicalized extremists. These tactics have not worked before, what
makes the Clinton campaign believe it’ll be any different this time around?
President Obama is also worried about the conversation
veering away from gun control, fearing an “either/or”
dichotomy while preferring a “both/and” discourse. Unfortunately, this
perspective conflates the two issues while simultaneously stressing the importance
of keeping weapons out of the hands of terrorists. That has been the major
point Clinton has been hitting at recently, being questioned or labeled as a
terrorist must immediately lead to a complete ban on buying firearms. How will
this stop the next Adam Lanza or Dylann Roof attack, when their white faces
will hardly ever cross the NSA or FBI’s surveillance?
There is no doubt that Clinton and Obama are serious when
proposing new restrictions and laws overseeing the sale of firearms, including
strengthening background checks or restricting domestic violence offenders from
obtaining weapons. But if we allow Trump and other conservatives to control the
discussion of the attack to focus solely on terrorists thousands of miles away from
Orlando and the rest of America, there will be no meaningful change to gun
laws.

No comments:
Post a Comment